I know everyone is excited about the Tonys this weekend, but let’s start the festivities with Friday Questions.
Poochie is up first.
Say they were to recreate this experiment with Cheers (a suggestion tossed by Alan Sepinwall), which episode would you pick and who you cast? It almost assuredly has to be a Sam/Diane centered season one episode doesn't it?
Even if they were going to pick two episodes that David Isaacs and I wrote and pay us in full for the episodes again, I would still strongly lobby to not do a recreation in any form.
Because here’s my question: Regardless of who you cast, would it be any better than the original? And if not, then why do it?
Billy Wilder had a great line about sequels. He said, why remake good movies? Why not remake bad movies, fix them, and make them good movies?
That’s how I feel about CHEERS. Watch the originals. They’re pretty damn good.
There was a stage play in Chicago in 2016 that tried to recreate several episodes. It did not go on to Broadway.
Craig Gustafson asks:
Ken - what do you think about the British practice (and I don't know if it is still used) of combining the forms - live action, three-camera shoot until they go outside, then it's one-camera. I first saw it on "Monty Python's Flying Circus," and it was very disconcerting until I got used to it. "Fawlty Towers" stayed indoors for the most part, but Basil occasionally ventured out into the mono-cinematographic world.
After the first one-camera series of "The Black Adder," they decided that being seen on horses wasn't *that* important and the succeeding series were all three-camera, live audience.
I think it’s weird. Different styles can take you out of the story. Monty Python was just quick sketches so it didn’t really matter, but it’s hard for me watching British sitcoms switch back and forth from tape to (what looks like crappy 16mm) film.
Again, how does that mixture of styles improve the show?
From Mary Warwick :
Who is cashing in on the ratings juggernaut that is James Holzhauer? Affiliate stations? The show itself? I don't understand how ad rates are set for syndicated shows. Second question, would you ever want to be on Jeopardy? I wouldn't.
The show itself and the syndicator. But a high tide floats all boats. Local stations make money on the increased advertising sales.
Quite often affiliate stations are required to air programs within a certain time frame. I suspect for JEOPARDY and WHEEL OF FORTUNE, stations must air them between 5-8 PM. So that helps ratings. You're not averaging in stations that air it at 12:30 in the morning.
I would love to be a contestant on JEOPARDY except I would completely embarrass myself since I don’t know shit about geography, poets of the 17th Century, religion, and 16-letter words that also turn into medical conditions by just switching two letters.
And finally, from Frank:
In season two of Bosch, there's a character referred to as "Big Wave Dave." It's not exactly a tribute, as he's a Very Bad Fellow. Was this an intentional nod by someone on the show, or just a coincidence?
None of the vaulted BIG WAVE DAVE’S writers are on that show so I would say it’s a wonderful tribute to us accidentally.
There are a couple of surf shops and I think a restaurant named Big Wave Dave’s. All I know is no one sued us.
But thanks to BOSCH for keeping the memory of our classic six-episode series alive.
What’s your Friday Question?
from By Ken Levine
Poochie is up first.
Say they were to recreate this experiment with Cheers (a suggestion tossed by Alan Sepinwall), which episode would you pick and who you cast? It almost assuredly has to be a Sam/Diane centered season one episode doesn't it?
Even if they were going to pick two episodes that David Isaacs and I wrote and pay us in full for the episodes again, I would still strongly lobby to not do a recreation in any form.
Because here’s my question: Regardless of who you cast, would it be any better than the original? And if not, then why do it?
Billy Wilder had a great line about sequels. He said, why remake good movies? Why not remake bad movies, fix them, and make them good movies?
That’s how I feel about CHEERS. Watch the originals. They’re pretty damn good.
There was a stage play in Chicago in 2016 that tried to recreate several episodes. It did not go on to Broadway.
Craig Gustafson asks:
Ken - what do you think about the British practice (and I don't know if it is still used) of combining the forms - live action, three-camera shoot until they go outside, then it's one-camera. I first saw it on "Monty Python's Flying Circus," and it was very disconcerting until I got used to it. "Fawlty Towers" stayed indoors for the most part, but Basil occasionally ventured out into the mono-cinematographic world.
After the first one-camera series of "The Black Adder," they decided that being seen on horses wasn't *that* important and the succeeding series were all three-camera, live audience.
I think it’s weird. Different styles can take you out of the story. Monty Python was just quick sketches so it didn’t really matter, but it’s hard for me watching British sitcoms switch back and forth from tape to (what looks like crappy 16mm) film.
Again, how does that mixture of styles improve the show?
From Mary Warwick :
Who is cashing in on the ratings juggernaut that is James Holzhauer? Affiliate stations? The show itself? I don't understand how ad rates are set for syndicated shows. Second question, would you ever want to be on Jeopardy? I wouldn't.
The show itself and the syndicator. But a high tide floats all boats. Local stations make money on the increased advertising sales.
Quite often affiliate stations are required to air programs within a certain time frame. I suspect for JEOPARDY and WHEEL OF FORTUNE, stations must air them between 5-8 PM. So that helps ratings. You're not averaging in stations that air it at 12:30 in the morning.
I would love to be a contestant on JEOPARDY except I would completely embarrass myself since I don’t know shit about geography, poets of the 17th Century, religion, and 16-letter words that also turn into medical conditions by just switching two letters.
And finally, from Frank:
In season two of Bosch, there's a character referred to as "Big Wave Dave." It's not exactly a tribute, as he's a Very Bad Fellow. Was this an intentional nod by someone on the show, or just a coincidence?
None of the vaulted BIG WAVE DAVE’S writers are on that show so I would say it’s a wonderful tribute to us accidentally.
There are a couple of surf shops and I think a restaurant named Big Wave Dave’s. All I know is no one sued us.
But thanks to BOSCH for keeping the memory of our classic six-episode series alive.
What’s your Friday Question?
from By Ken Levine
Comments
Post a Comment