From Keith:
Now that you're doing your plays do you try to write to deadline, or is it more of a "whenever it's done, it's done" kind of thing? Would you encourage young writers to set self-imposed deadlines?
After writing on deadlines for several centuries, it’s a great luxury to finish at my leisure. Still, I tend to move at a pretty good clip, and I like to keep some momentum going so I generally finish in a timely manner.
And of course, if I have a play in rehearsal, then I’m re-writing every night and it’s just like being on staff of a TV show again (except there’s no staff – there’s just me).
For young writers however, I would encourage a self-imposed deadline, as long as it’s reasonable. Don’t create added pressure on yourself, but figure how long you think it will take to finish a certain project, allow yourself some added breathing room then set a deadline.
Remember, should you sell a movie or TV pilot and get into the business, deadlines are SOP. Might as well get used to them.
Unknown asks:
Why do the networks hate me? Anything I like gets canceled, and most don't make sense.
It’s because you don’t list a name and just go by “Unknown.” Networks hate that.
(Sorry. Just couldn’t resist.)
Jonny M. wonders:
Have you ever been on a show and just hated the direction the show runner was taking it? How do you deal with that?
I’ve been very lucky that I’ve never been in that exact situation. But I have consulted on shows like that and I have directed on shows like that.
And my philosophy is to just go with it. Tell me what you want, what joke, etc. and I’ll do my best to provide it. It’s not my ass when the show tanks.
And fighting with the showrunner does you no good. You’re not going to change his mind; you’re only going to make an enemy. And getting an ulcer over writing for 2 BROKE GIRLS is hardly worth it.
If the show is too intolerable then quit. Otherwise, just do the best you can and try not to work yourself into a daily lather. They’re paying you. You’re working on a TV show and not cleaning the grease traps at McDonalds. There are worse ways of making a living.
But keep your eyes open at all times for better opportunities.
And finally, from Toledo (a person, not the city):
What is your opinion of the trend of TV baseball announcers that spend an inordinate amount of time talking about subjects that have nothing to do with the game they are purporting broadcasting? I'm not talking about Vin Scully's interesting tidbits of information that he used to fill in between pitches, or Harry Carey's sometimes humorous tangential expositions about restaurants in a visiting city.
I'm thinking about whole innings that seem to be devoted to a detailed presentation on some baseball subject, such as the future of some pitcher who is not starting this game or some long term trade strategy. The entire discussion seems to be pre-planned since it is often supplemented with numerous prepared graphics and backup research.
Meanwhile, the action on the field is generally ignored by the announcers, no matter how interesting it may be.
The worst situations occur when there is a guest in the booth, or when one of the players or the manager is being interviewed remotely from the dugout. Obviously, I am not a fan of this as I want to focus on the game I am tuned in to watch.
Well, obviously it depends on exactly what topic they’re discussing, how relevant it is, how topical it is, and what the game situation is. If it’s a 9-0 blowout the announcers have to talk about something.
But my problem is very few of the current crop of announcers have any flair, any showmanship, anything personal to offer. They’re bland, interchangeable, terrified that someone is going to rip them on Twitter, and so their commentary is reduced to what I like to call “baseball for scouts.”
I’d say they should find ways to entertain the audience, but so few of these guys even have that ability. They need to be storytellers with a sense of the dramatic and the majority of these deep-voiced young robots have no talent for that whatsoever. So what you get are long discussions on pitcher-hitter match ups. Zzzzzzz.
That’s why someone like Jason Benetti of the White Sox stands out. To me he’s the next Vin Scully. Calls a great game, understands analytics, has perspective, works great with his partner Steve Stone, and has a sense of humor. It is such a pleasure to listen to Jason call a game. He restores my faith that TV baseball announcers CAN be fun and interesting.
from By Ken Levine
Comments
Post a Comment