Owlchum gets us rolling.
You'll read every once in a while about actors who are so in tune with their characters that they will decline to do a line or a scene stating their characters wouldn't say/do that. I'm curious if you've had that problem in the writing room i.e. a scribe who felt so possessive about a character that he/she actually became too disruptive in finishing script(s)?
Yes, it happens, but let me say this. Fighting for your script to the point of being disruptive is the fastest way to get yourself fired off a staff.
Here’s the thing: You’re not going to win.
The showrunner is not going to put back your material because you put on a full court press. So you lose the battle and lose the war when you’re out of a job.
And it doesn’t matter if you’re right. It’s not your call.
Suck it up. That’s part of being a professional. It's happened to all of us. Multiple times.
The showrunner points the boat and you all row in that direction. Someday if you pay your dues you might be the showrunner and you change other writers’ scripts at will. But for now, don’t jeopardize your job, reputation, and career.
Philly Cinephile wonders:
How far in advance do you write your blog posts? Is every post "written to order" or do you have a cache of essays that you can pull from if you're short on time?
Both. I try to have some posts prepared in advance to lesson the burden of constant deadlines. But I also love the immediacy of something happening one day, being able to write about it, and having it post the next day.
Friday Questions I usually prepare in advance.
I probably shouldn't divulge these closely guarded secrets, but what the hell?
Jeff asks:
Ken, do you get personally annoyed when you watch modern shows and the credits list half the cast as a "producer" or "executive producer"? Are you worried these stars and their agents will next push for writing credits?
You need to write a script to get writing credit. And if you’re a staff member rewriting a script it’s harder to get shared credit. This is to prevent people in power from arbitrarily piggy-backing their name on writing credits.
As for number of producers, I don’t mind at all if they’re writers. More producers mean more working writers. And you move up in pay grade as your title improves. So more power to ‘em.
However, I don’t like all the non-writing producer credits. “Pod” producers who basically do nothing, managers, and stars. These are all vanity positions that eat into the showrunner/creator’s potential profit in success, and are often sources of obstruction. They’re the partners you don’t need.
And finally, from marka:
I was watching an unnamed movie which was fantastic until the end, which seemed slapped together. It seems to be a thing where someone has a great idea, develops the story really well but then has some disappointing conclusion. Like they just can't figure out how to end the darn thing. Could you comment on this? It doesn't happen all the time, but more than it should it seems.
Most studio films have preview screenings, and if the audience doesn’t like the ending, or the studio feels it’s too much of a downer, whatever — the filmmaker will often scramble to quickly come up with a new ending and shoot it. So it becomes a mad scramble with other factors that must be worked out. Which actors are available for re-shoots? Which sets are still up? How much will it cost? How much will we have to cut from the existing film which led to the ending you’re throwing out? How much time do you have? When is the release date?
More often than not what you end up with are band-aids and endings that are “better” in that they address the audience’s concern, but not really “good.”
What’s your Friday Question?
from By Ken Levine
Comments
Post a Comment